Vegan
for Life
at
The Cat-Tea Corner™
Living
vegan and cruelty-free; our vegan recipe collection, animals
in Romania; writings and poetry; Vegan and Cruelty-free Web
Ring. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
egan for Life
|
Our vegan recipe collection 
Over
400 recipes. We try to avoid
"weird" ingredients or excessively complicated recipes; most
of our recipes are accessible to everyone. These are dishes we enjoy
ourselves, and we hope you will enjoy preparing and eating them too!
Join our vegan recipe collection mailing list
and we'll let you know when new recipes are added to our collection.
Common expressions and
sayings are often based on animals' misfortunes. Here are some life-affirming alternative expressions!
Read
what people -- some famous, some not-so-famous -- have written about the animals in
our lives and our world.
A special report on Animals in Romania from
Associated Humane Societies.
Here's a bonus for all
you crafty animal-lovers: fold a flying origami bat!
Lots
of links to vegan, vegetarian, animal-friendly, and healthful web sites.
- Vegetarian
and cruelty-free -- here's why
I've been a vegetarian for more than
half my lifetime. A few years ago I decided to stop eating all animal products and became
a vegan. A vegan [vee-gun] is a person who eats no products of animal origin. A Vegan
[vay-gun] is a person from Las Vegas or an alien from the planet Vega -- although
sometimes people think vegans are from another planet too! :-)
It used to be very difficult to find
tasty vegetarian/vegan foods. Things have gotten better, and a growing number of
restaurants and supermarkets sell an ever-increasing selection of vegetarian foods as more
people request them. The increasing popularity of a plant-based diet will surely make us,
our planet, and our fellow creatures healthier!
If you want to know more about
vegetarianism/veganism, please keep reading. Or check out my list of links to
vegetarian-related web sites.
And about the term
"vegetarian:" This word can be a noun -- as in "I'm a vegetarian" --
or an adjective -- as in "I'm enjoying a vegetarian meal." If any meals you eat
don't contain animal products, those meals would be described as vegetarian (adjective);
if some of the meals you eat do contain flesh products, the meal is not
vegetarian (adjective), and you are not a vegetarian (noun)! No slight or insult -- just a
point of fact. Once you've made the commitment to not eat any more non-vegetarian
(adjective) meals, then you become a vegetarian (noun). Simple, no?
Vegetarians do not eat flesh,
whether from land, air, or water creatures. People who eat any of these creatures as
any part
of their diet are not vegetarians, even if many of their meals are vegetarian. Contrary to
media rumours, there is no such thing as a "part-time vegetarian:" you either
are or you're not! It isn't clear why anyone would want to be called such a thing anyway,
especially when there's already a perfectly good word that describes this type of diet: omnivorous
(an omnivore is one who consumes both animal and vegetable products). Language is a
wonderful tool, and accurate communication aids in mutual understanding.
If you are following an omnivorous
diet, I would like to encourage you to eat more vegetarian meals, and to maybe become a
vegetarian (or vegan). There are many compelling reasons to choose this diet and
lifestyle:
- Concern for
animals
- I believe that non-human animals have
souls, just like human animals, and that it is just as wrong to kill an animal as it is to
kill a human. Animals have hearts and brains, and they certainly have feelings, so there
can be no excuse for deliberately causing pain or fear in a fellow creature -- whether you
do it yourself or let someone else do it for you. Non-human animals are not cruel to their
fellow creatures; only humans are capable of such acts. Think about
it: Somebody has
bombed the World Trade Centre, four airplanes, and a Federal office
building. There are near-daily attacks on innocent civilians in
Israel, France, and elsewhere. One group
of people may enslave or murder another group of people simply because they have
different beliefs or look different -- one example is the current
genocide being committed by Arabs in Sudan. Parents abuse their children.
People mistreat animals. When you see all this, you have to wonder whether humans truly
are the most highly evolved animals on this planet.
-
- Concern for
Earth and its inhabitants
- Raising animals for food requires a
lot more land than it takes to raise grains, beans, and other life-giving plants. If
everyone ate plant foods instead of animals there could be about ten times as much food
available. No person would ever need to be hungry -- no child would starve to death. No
more precious rainforests and ecosystems would be destroyed! Besides the land resources,
ranching animals instead of farming crops uses much more water for less return. And the
waste products produced either by the animals themselves or as a result of the
slaughtering process contribute heavily to the pollution of our air and water.
-
- Health
concerns
- Heart disease, obesity, stroke,
cancer. Every day we hear about how a diet high in animal fats, cholesterol, and other
animal products contributes to these conditions. Nutritionists, physicians, and scientists
have been telling us for years to eat more fruits, vegetables, grains, etc. and to
eliminate all (or a good percentage of) animal foods from our diets. It takes much more
time and energy for our bodies to digest animal products than plant foods. Studies have
also shown that about 70% of the human population can't tolerate dairy milk -- so why do
we try to force our bodies to accept it? (Did you know that humans are the only animals on
Earth that continue drinking milk after weaning ... or drink the milk of another species?)
Many people suffer frequent heartburn, upset stomach, and other digestive disorders after
eating these foods. The drug industry does a booming business selling products to help
relieve disorders that could be far less common if people ate a more appropriate diet! Try
a sensible, healthful diet based on plant foods, and see if you don't feel better.
-
- Esthetic
concerns
- I'm frequently amazed by how much
time my flesh-eating friends spend cleaning grease in their kitchens, on cookware, etc.
Their food tends to go bad rather quickly, too. And I wonder how many would eat flesh if
they couldn't season it, or had to eat it all uncooked? Yes, I'm aware that some people
like some of the flesh they eat to be raw, but not all or even most of it. Other than
potatoes and eggplant, I can't think of any plant food that doesn't taste good raw. And
cooked plant foods taste good, too -- with or without seasoning! Esthetics also influence
my choice of clothing, shoes, cosmetics, household products, etc. I do my best to avoid
products made of animal skins or other animal parts, or that have been tested on animals.
Fortunately, it is becoming much easier to find cruelty-free products because so many
concerned people have pressured manufacturers to stop exploiting animals.
-
- Concern for
peace -- and peace of mind
- I believe that acts of violence
only beget more violence. I do not want to start the cycle, so I do
not want to eat anything that was brought to my table
through the violence of slaughter. Perhaps if we all fed ourselves life-affirming foods,
rather than dead bodies, we could become more peaceful and more tolerant of our
neighbours. Who knows? Maybe we would even see an end to racism,
anti-Semitism, and old hatreds. It could happen ...
|
The
Pig's Pick of the Day
George
Bates, an officer in Coastal Division 11, participated in numerous operations
with [John] Kerry. In Unfit for Command, Bates recalls a particular
patrol with Kerry on the Song Bo De River. He is still "haunted" by
the incident:
With Kerry
in the lead, the boats approached a small hamlet with three or four grass
huts. Pigs and chickens were milling around peacefully. As the boats drew
closer, the villagers fled. There were no political symbols or flags in
evidence in the tiny village. It was obvious to Bates that existing policies,
decency, and good sense required the boats to simply move on.
Instead,
Kerry beached his boat directly in the small settlement. Upon his command, the
numerous small animals were slaughtered by heavy-caliber machine guns. Acting
more like a pirate than a naval officer, Kerry disembarked and ran around with
a Zippo lighter, burning up the entire hamlet. [Drudge
Report, August 12, 2004]
Is
this his idea of a more "sensitive" war?
|
 |
  |
|
|